Hafsa Shimayela Alam, Minor U/G Mohammed Tayyab Alam v. The State Of Mah And ORS
(1) WP No.5911/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 8099 OF 2012 Hafsa Shimayela Alam Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents.
*** Ms. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt.M.A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr. S.C. Swami, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 4. *** CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Dated :
04-12-2017.
PER COURT :- 1.
Shri Jadhavar, learned Advocate causes an appearance on behalf of respondent No.2. Service on the respondents is complete. 2.
We have heard the submissions of the learned Advocates for the respective sides. The prayers put-forth by the petitioner in this Petition in Clauses B, C and D read as under :- B) The original answer sheet of the petitioner may kindly be called for, by issuing any appropriate writ, order or direction as the case may be.
(2) WP No.5911/2008 C) The respondent No.4 be directed to make the reassessment of answer sheet of the Petitioner for the engineering mechanic subject code 12015 for summer 2012, by issuing any appropriate writ order or direction as the case may be.
D) The Respondents be directed to give admission to the Petitioner for V semester for academic year 2012-2013, and allow her to appear for V semester examination to be held in the month of November 2012/ December 2012, for academic year 2012/2013, by issuing any appropriate writ order or directions as the case may be.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite her best efforts, the petitioner is not responding and is not coming forward to give any instructions.
4.
Considering the prayers reproduced above and the passage of more than five years, we find that this Petition is rendered infructuous. 5.
The same is, therefore, dismissed as being infructuous. ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/