← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11855/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Marathwada Ustod Kamgar Vikas Mandal Through Its Secretary Sonerao Bhimrao Sathbhai And Another v. Balaji Laxman Phad And Another

2016-08-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11855 OF 2016 (Marathwada Ustod Kamgar Vikas Mandal and another Vs. Balaji Laxman Phad and another) IN WRIT PETITION NO.1998 OF 2016 Mr.Mobin Shaikh, Advocate for the applicants. Mr.Swami h/f Mr.V.D.Gunale, Advocate for respondent no.1. ( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) DATE : 29/08/2016 PER COURT :

1.

The petitioners/applicants desire to add paragraph Nos. 10-A to 10-C so as to bring on record certain government resolutions which were not earlier pointed out.

2.

Mr.Gunale, learned Advocate strenuously opposes the said application. He has placed reliance upon the affidavit in reply dated 29/08/2016 by which it is contended that the proposed paragraphs are insignificant and do not deserve to be brought on record. 3.

Considering the above, I deem it proper to allow this application and permit the applicant to amend the petition by granting leave to the respondents to file an additional affidavit to khs/AUGUST 2016/11855-d

oppose the amended portion of the petition.

4.

This application is, therefore, allowed. Amendment to be carried out within 2 weeks from today. Learned Advocate for the respondents is at liberty to file an additional affidavit in reply within a period of 3 (three) weeks from today.

5.

Stand over to 30/09/2016.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) khs/AUGUST 2016/11855-d