Rajendrakumar Sukhdev Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 21 wp-10098.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 WRIT PETITION NO.10098 OF 2019 RAJENDRAKUMAR SUKHDEV PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Ms. Nayana Patil, Advocate holding for Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. Vinod Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No. 5. ...

CORAM :

DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE :

14th February 2022.

ORDER :

1.

Ms. Nayana Patil, learned advocate holding for Ms. Surekha Mahajan, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that Ms. Mahajan has received written instructions from the petitioner to seek withdrawal of the writ petition. A prayer to that effect is made by her.

2.

The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. No costs. 3.

The written instructions tendered by Ms. Nayana Patil shall be retained with the record.

(N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) VD_Dhirde