← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9951/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Lagad Ajay Vinayakrao And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale2 pages

(1) 41-wp-9951-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 41 WRIT PETITION NO.9951 OF 2018 LAGAD AJAY VINAYAKRAO AND OTHERS ..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPODENTS ...

Mr. Suvidh S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondents-State. Mrs. Suvarna M. Zaware, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATED : 05th FEBRUARY, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

The present writ petition is filed challenging the show cause notice issued to petitioners calling explanation from petitioners as to why disciplinary action should not be initiated against petitioners.

2.

The petitioners have liberty to file reply to the same.

3.

The petitioners may file reply to the same, if no further orders are passed by the Disciplinary Authority. If such, reply is filed by

(2) 41-wp-9951-2018 petitioners, the Authority shall consider the said reply before proceeding further.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(A. M. DHAVALE) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/February-19