Shrikisan Manikrao Divte v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:33502 25 CA 10212 OF 2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10212 OF 2025 IN FAST/23620/2025 SHRIKISAN MANIKRAO DIVTE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pingale Durgesh M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Hange ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 02.12.2025 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 5891 days in preferring appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks condonation of delay for the reasons stated in the application.

3.

The application is contested by the learned A.G.P., who is appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2. None appears for the contesting respondent no. 3.

4.

The averments of the application have not been traversed. There is no material on record to infer any mala fides on the part of the applicant. This Court has no alternative than to accept the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay. The applicants are ready to forgo interest and the statutory benefits for the delayed period. 5.

The delay stands condoned subject to forfeiture of interest and 1/2

25 CA 10212 OF 2025.odt statutory benefits for the delayed period.

FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) :

6.

Admit. Learned A.G.P. waives service for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. 7.

Call for record and proceedings.

8.

Print is dispensed with.

( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 2/2