Ranjana Deelip Kamble And ORS v. Ramchandra Shankar Pawar And ORS

969 ca12996.11 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 969 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12996 OF 2011 IN FAST/25911/2011 RANJANA DEELIP KAMBLE AND ORS

VERSUS

RAMCHANDRA SHANKAR PAWAR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Mr. G.R. Syed h/f Mr. R.R. Adgaonkar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 & 3 : Mr. Mr. P.V. Barde Advocate for Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Mr. A.S. Usmanpurkar .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 7th JULY, 2017 PER COURT:- 1.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the bread winner of the family met with an accidental death and as such the applicants could not prefer appeal within limitation due to financial constraints. Learned counsel for the respondent insurer has strongly resisted the application on the ground that delay has not been satisfactorily explained. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 has also resisted the application. None present for other respondents. 2.

In view of above submissions and for the reasons stated in the civil application, delay of 582 days caused in filing first appeal is hereby condoned. Civil application is disposed of.

3.

In first appeal, heard. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 18.08.2017. Learned counsel waive notice for respective respondents. Call for record and proceedings. ( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/