Kanhaiyalal Maharaj Mandir Trust, Aamali And ORS v. Harshvardhan Shivajirao Dahite And ORS

(1) 942 CA-10191.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10191 OF 2021 IN FA/2082/2021 SHRI KANHAIYALAL MAHARAJ MANDIR TRUST, AAMALI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

HARSHVARDHAN SHIVAJIRAO DAHITE AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicants. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

25.08.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

It appears that there is an interim order in terms of prayer clause [A] which has been continued till today from time to time. The contesting respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 though served, but remained absent. Further, respondent Nos. 4, 6 and 7 though have died, but their legal representatives are not required to be brought on record. In view of the same, the application is now made absolute in terms of prayer clause [A] during the pendency of this appeal.

2.

Appeal is admitted. Issue notice to the respondents on admission returnable on 13.10.2022. Call record and proceeding.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde