← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9846/2019disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Balasaheb Rangnathrao Dahiphale

2020-01-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil3 pages

1 ca 9836.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9836 OF 2019 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 24597 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6958 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra and another .. Applicants

Versus

Uttamrao Manikrao Jaybhaye .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9841 OF 2019 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 24593 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6956 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra and another .. Applicants

Versus

Sunil Vishwanathrao Modak .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9843 OF 2019 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 24599 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6961 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra and another .. Applicants

Versus

Sandeep Vishwanath Shinde .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9844 OF 2019 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 24591 OF 2019 IN

2 ca 9836.19 WRIT PETITION NO. 6960 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra and another .. Applicants

Versus

Pravin Siddheshwar Shete .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9845 OF 2019 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 24601 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6955 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra and another .. Applicants

Versus

Parshuram Vitthalrao Pawar .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9846 OF 2019 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 24603 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6962 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra and another .. Applicants

Versus

Balasaheb Rangnathrao Dahiphale .. Respondent Shri P. S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for Applicants in all matters. Shri S. G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent in all matters.

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

10TH JANUARY, 2020.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Heard Mr. Patil, the learned Additional Government Pleader for applicants and Mr. Chapalgaonkar, the learned

3 ca 9836.19 counsel for the respondent/non applicant.

2.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of three (03) days caused in filing the review applications is condoned. The civil applications are disposed of. [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Jan. 20