Annapurna D/O Sudampadar @ Annapurna (Died) Thr Lrs Ashwini And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Jalna And ORS

{1} ca13098.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13098 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 23744 OF 2022 Annapurna d/o Sudam Pawar @ Annapurna w/o Dashrath Ghorsad (died) through L. Rs.

Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13138 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 23731 OF 2022 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13139 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 23707 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13140 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 24096 OF 2022 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13141 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 23712 OF 2022 Mr. V. D. Bhise, advocate for the Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, Mr. A. B. Chate and Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGPs for Respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. S. C. Bhosle, Mr. S. C. Arora, advocates for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 09th January, 2023.

PC :

{2} ca13098.22.odt Heard rival submissions.

Respective applicants-claimants, in all these applications, are seeking condonation of delay periods, as mentioned therein, which appears to be caused due to their financial crisis.

The learned AGP as well as the respective learned Counsel for acquiring body, strongly opposed the applications on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods, in all these applications, stand condoned subject to the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay . The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb