Subhash Ramchandra Shirsath v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2024:BHC-AUG:19914

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7240 OF 2016 IN FAST/31081/2015 Babulal Bacchulal Jaiswal Died Through L.Rs.Bhartibai And Others

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8307 OF 2017 iN FAST/16472/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8580 OF 2017 IN FAST/16163/2017 WITH CA/8581/17 IN FAST/16655/17 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8586 OF 2017 IN FAST/14168/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13127 OF 2017 IN FAST/17199/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13136 OF 2017 IN FAST/17280/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13150 OF 2017 IN FAST/17266/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13151 OF 2017 IN FAST/17208/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13216 OF 2017 IN FAST/16681/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14039 OF 2017 IN FAST/16671/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14067 OF 2017 IN FAST/16185/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14069 OF 2017 IN FAST/16171/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14066 OF 2017 IN FAST/16174/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

14068 OF 2017 IN FAST/16179/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1071 OF 2018 IN FAST/26188/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1077 OF 2018 IN FAST/15258/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1075 OF 2018 IN FAST/15263/2017 WITH CA/1076/18 IN FAST/15261/17 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1145 OF 2018 IN FAST/27573/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1967 OF 2018 IN FAST/26303/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2358 OF 2018 IN FAST/30817/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2873 OF 2018 IN FAST/15253/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2872 OF 2018 IN FAST/15256/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3134 OF 2018 IN FAST/31414/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5828 OF 2018 IN FAST/11242/2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5829 OF 2018 IN FAST/11707/2017 ......

Ms. Sakshi Kale, Advocate h/f Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate for Applicants Ms. Chailtali Kutti Choudhary, Advocate for Respondent No.3. ......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 30th AUGUST, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

These are the applications filed by applicants/claimants for condonation of delay in filing the first appeals.

3.

Learned advocate for respondent No.3/acquiring body strenuously opposed to condone the delay stating that delay is not properly explained.

4.

For the reasons stated in the applications, applications are allowed. Delay condoned.

5.

Appeals be registered.

6.

Applicants/claimants shall not be entitled to claim interest for the period of delay.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE