← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14244/2022delay condonatedrejected

Neha Tabassum W/O Syed Bilal v. Syed Bilal S/O Syed Pasha

2023-09-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

1 ca 14244.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14244 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 23762 OF 2022 Neha Tabassum W/o Syed Bilal .. Applicant

Versus

Syed Bilal S/o Syed Pasha .. Respondent Shri D. S. Patil, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri Shaikh Wajeed Ahmed, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM :

MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE :

13 SEPTEMBER 2023.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Heard both sides.

2.

This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 91 days by the wife caused in preferring appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court. 3.

We have heard both the sides.

4.

Considering the nature of the dispute and taking into account the fact that it is wife who is seeking condonation of delay, which is neither exorbitant, nor intentional. For the

2 ca 14244.22 reasons mentioned in the application, the civil application is allowed. The delay is condoned. The Registry to register the family court appeal. The civil application is disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ] bsb/Sept. 23