Bapurao S/O Pandhari Takle v. Samadhan Ambrushi Borade And ANR

Cri.Appln.No.4451/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4451 OF 2015 Samadhan Ambrushi Borade ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicant Mr S.R. Palnitkar, A.P.P. for respondent Mr G.J. Kore, Advocate assisting the A.P.P.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4677 OF 2015 Bapurao s/p Pandhari Takle ..Applicant

Versus

Samadhan Ambrushi Borade and anr.

..Respondents Mr G.J. Kore, Advocate for applicant, assisting the A.P.P. Mr Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr S.R. Palnitkar, A.P.P. for respondent No.2 CORAM : A.I.S CHEEMA, J.

DATE : 21st September 2015 PER COURT 1.

Counsel for applicant seeks time to argue the matter. He submits that office objections regarding certain documents not being legible be waived, as according to him, he would not be relying on the same.

2.

If there are any documents, which are not relevant and are vague, learned A.P.P. can object to it.

3.

List the matter for final argument on 7th October 2015. 4.

Criminal Application No.4677 of 2015 filed by Mr Kore that he wants to assist the A.P.P. on behalf of original complainant.

Cri.Appln.No.4451/2015 5.

Counsel for applicant does not have objection. Application is allowed. Counsel for original complainant may assist the A.P.P. ( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) vvr