← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8956/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Sandeep Sudhakar Kokate And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.L. Wadane2 pages

28.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 28 WRIT PETITION NO. 8956 OF 2015 WITH WP/8866/2015 SANDEEP SUDHAKAR KOKATE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners :Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Mr. Ashwin V. Hon AGP for Respondents State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. M. N. Nawandar Advocate for respondent No.4: Mr. S. R. Deshpande

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE :

19th September, 2016 ORDER:

1.

Learned AGP states that with regard to the recruitment process i.e. the subject matter of the present petition, enquiry was conducted by the State and it is found that there is no substance in the complaint made by the complainant and the Agricultural Universities are directed to conduct selection process and fill in the posts.

2.

This Court, on 7th April, 2016, has passed the following order:

"Petitioners have apprehension that respondents are delaying the matter of making reference to another committee. It is contended that by the 1/2

28.odt time the decision is taken the petitioners would be rendered age barred and will not be offered employment. It is clarified that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, such defence that petitioners have become age barred and are not entitled to be accommodated would not be available for respondents in the event petitioners succeed in the instant petition."

3.

In view of the said order, this court had already directed that the defence that the petitioners have become age barred and are not entitled to be accommodated would not be available for the respondents. As now the State Government has directed to start the process for appointment, the University is expected to proceed further with the selection process which has been undertaken, keeping in mind the order dated 7th April, 2016 as quoted above.

4.

Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 2/2