← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/3029/2025application allowed

Prashant Alias Bhavadya Narendra Sardar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025-09-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

cran3029.25 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 108 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3029 OF 2025 IN BA/570/2025 Prashant Alias Bhavadya Narendra Sardar

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sudhakar T. Mahajan APP for Respondents: Mr. S.B. Narwade .....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

PER COURT :- 1.

This is an application for relaxation of condition that the applicant shall not enter into village Tamaswadi, Tq. Parola, District Jalgaon, till the conclusion of trial, imposed by this Court while releasing the applicant on bail, vide order dated 28.04.2025, in bail application No. 570 of 2025.

2.

Learned advocate for the applicant pointed out the order dated 28.04.2025 passed by this court in bail application No.570 of 2025. While releasing the applicant on bail, this court has imposed the aforesaid condition. Learned advocate for the applicant has also pointed out the similar order passed by the learned J.M.F.C. court dated 23.6.2025. He submitted that the applicant is a law student and he has to attend the college. He has no criminal antecedents. Now

cran3029.25 -2the charge sheet is filed. His wife is pregnant and nobody is there to look after her. He therefore, prayed for relaxation of aforesaid condition.

3.

Learned A.P.P. for the State strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no such document showing admission taken in the college, produced on record by the applicant. He submitted to reject the application.

4.

Perused the order dated 28.04.2025 passed by this Court in bail application No.570 of 2025. Considering the peculiar facts of the case, particularly that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and the trial would take a long period, the application deserves to be allowed. In case of pressurizing the prosecution witnesses or tampering the evidence, if any overt act is noted on the part of the applicant, the prosecution may directly apply to the trial court for cancellation of bail of this applicant.

5.

Considering all these aspects and the reasons stated the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and disposed of.

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/