Sudhir Navnath Salpe And Others v. Manukumar Shrivastav, The State Of Maharashtra And Others
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1059 CONT. PETITION NO.506 OF 2021 IN WP/4151/2021 BALIRAM BABAN GAWATE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV, THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. A.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. S.S. Dambe ...
AND 1060 CONT. PETITION NO.507 OF 2021 IN WP/2189/2021 BABAN DEVRAO GAWATE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV, THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. A.R. Kale AND 1061 CONT. PETITION NO.508 OF 2021 IN WP/4118/2021 SUDHIR NAVNATH SALPE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV, THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. A.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi ...
.. 2 ..
AND 1064 CONT. PETITION NO.511 OF 2021 IN WP/4162/2021 JANABAI BAJIRAO SONDGE
VERSUS
MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV, THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. A.R. Kale
CORAM
: S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 16-12-2021 PER COURT :
1.
We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2.
The affidavit is filed by the Deputy Collector. It is stated in the said affidavit that the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, on 30-10-2021 sent a demand proposal to the Secretary. 3.
The learned AGP submits that the communication is received and that the amount has been sanctioned.
4.
The respondents shall make payment to the petitioners as directed earlier, positively within a period of six weeks.
.. 3 ..
5.
If the payment is not made to the petitioners within six weeks, then the respondents would make themselves liable for contempt. 6.
The Contempt Petitions are disposed of. No costs. ( S. G. DIGE ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE