← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1156/2023disposed off

Sonaji Champati Shinde v. The District Magistrate, Hingoli And Others

2023-12-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

903-WP-1156-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1156 OF 2023 Sonaji Champati Shinde ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The District Magistrate, Hingoli and Others ..RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. S.A. Kulkarni, Advocate h/f Mrs. R.L. Jakhade, Advocate for petitioner Ms. K.R. Jamdade, A.P.P. for respondents ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ DATE : 01st DECEMBER, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

The challenge in this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is to the order dated 27th February, 2023 passed by Respondent No.1 - District Magistrate, Hingoli in D.O. NO.2023 DC-01/KAVI144/2023/894 thereby detaining the petitioner under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Robber and Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981. Duration of detention is for twelve months. The challenge is only on the ground of delay in passing the order of detention.

1 / 2

903-WP-1156-23.odt 3.

Close reading of the order of detention indicates that last crime committed by the petitioner was registered on 28th August, 2022, whereas the order of detention was passed on 27th February, 2023 i.e. six months after registration of last committed crime. In-camera statements were also recorded in the very month. No affidavit-in-reply is filed explaining the delay in passing of order of detention. Nine months have been over post petitioner's detention. On the sole ground of there being no explanation for delay in passing the order of detention, we set aside the same. 4.

In view of above, criminal writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c).

( SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2