Poonam Dipak Sharma v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 10394.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10394 OF 2017 Poonam Dipak Sharma .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Subhash S. Mundhe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Arun V. Rakh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 08TH MARCH, 2018.

FINAL ORDER :

.

According to the petitioner, the petitioner's appointment as Shikshan Sevak from 15.06.2012 was approved for a period of three years. Thereafter, proposal was sent for permanent approval. The same is pending and not decided as yet. 2.

According to the learned Additional Government Pleader the posts were reduced for the academic year 2014-2015. As such the petitioner could not be issued with continuation order. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the Government Resolution dated 10.06.2005 and submits that, the

2 wp 10394.17 authority ought to have taken steps in accordance with said Government Resolution.

4.

As according to the respondents, posts have been subsequently reduced in the year 2014-2015, the respondent authority may take steps as per G. R. dated 10.06.2005 (page 64) Exhibit R - 2 expeditiously and pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of six (06) months from today. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/March 18