Sharad Chagan Saidane And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
2025:BHC-AUG:27789-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3062 OF 2025 1.
Sharad s/o Chagan Saindane 2.
Chagan s/o Mahadu Saindane 3.
Aasha w/o Harshal Saindane 4.
Sachin s/o Shenfadu Saindane 5.
Sunil Gopichand Sonawane 6.
Rekha w/o Sunil Sonawane 7.
Mayur Sunil Sonawane .. Applicants
Versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra Through the Investigating Officer, Police Station Bhusawal, District Jalgaon.
2.
Vidya Panditrao Koli .. Respondents ...
Mr. M. V. Salunke, Advocate for the applicants. Mrs. P. V. Diggikar, APP for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Amarjeet V. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2. ...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 29 SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER :- .
Present application has been filed for quashing the proceedings in Regular Criminal Case No.164 of 2025 pending before the learned [1]
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhusawal, District Jalgaon arising out of the FIR vide Crime No.257 of 2024 dated 28.11.2024 registered with Bhusawal Taluka Police Station, District Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 417, 418, 494, 496, 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2.
Both the sides have entered into compromise. They had filed the joint compromise terms which have been got verified through learned Registrar (Judicial) and he has filed the report on 18.09.2025. 3.
Learned Advocates for the applicants and respondent No.2 submit that applicant No.1 and respondent No.2 have entered into compromise. In the compromise terms it is stated that applicant No.1 would take the responsibility of respondent No.1 and her son. Further, it is stated that applicant No.1 would take care of the expenses of education of son. It is further stated that applicant No.1 would purchase property of Rs.70,00,000/- at Jalgaon and will give it to respondent No.2 and son for the purpose of security of their future. It has been further stated that due to the intervention of elderly persons, applicant No.1 and respondent No.2 have amicably settled their dispute. Therefore, respondent No.2 has given her consent for quashing the FIR as well as the consequential proceedings.
[2]
4.
In view of the compromise terms as well as the fact that respondent No.2 has specifically accepted that she is ready to give her consent for quashment of the FIR as well as the consequential proceedings, we take this to be a fit case where we can exercise our powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hence, the following order is passed :-
ORDER
I) Criminal Application stands allowed.
II) The proceedings in Regular Criminal Case No.164 of 2025 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhusawal, District Jalgaon arising out of the FIR vide Crime No.257 of 2024 dated 28.11.2024 registered with Bhusawal Taluka Police Station, District Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 417, 418, 494, 496, 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, stands quashed and set aside as against the present applicants.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [3]