Gautam Bhagwan Admane v. The State Of Maharashtra

*1*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3066 OF 2025 IN APEALST/8411/2025 GAUTAM BHAGWAN ADMANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Ms.Jayshri Pandurangrao Reddy, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Sunil B. Jadhav, APP for the Respondents/State. ...

AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 972 OF 2024 PRATAP MADHUKAR MASKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Shri Giri Prashant Prabhakar, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri Sunil B. Jadhav, APP for the Respondents/State. AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 573 OF 2024 KRIPANSINGH HATYARSINGH TAK

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Shri S.R. Mantri, Advocate h/f Shri Gangakhedkar Shailendra S., Advocate for the Appellant.

Shri Sunil B. Jadhav, APP for the Respondents/State. AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 574 OF 2025 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

SONU FITTER ALIAS AMOL BABASAHEB SONAWANE AND OTHERS

*2* ...

Shri Sunil B. Jadhav, APP for the Appellant/State. ...

CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.

DATE : 15 September, 2025 P. C. :- (a) Criminal Appeal No.574/2025:- 1.

At the outset, the learned APP states that Criminal Appeal No.574/2025 (The State of Maharashtra vs. Sonu Fitter and others) is wrongly tagged along with these matters. He, therefore, prays for de-tagging the same.

2.

Criminal Appeal No.574/2025 (The State of Maharashtra vs. Sonu Fitter and others) is de-tagged and be listed on 29.09.2025.

(b) Criminal Application No.3066/2025:- 3.

Heard.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application and as the applicant is in jail, Criminal Application No.3066/2025 is allowed. Delay is condoned and the appeal be registered.

*3* (c) Criminal Appeal (stamp) No.8411/2025:- 5.

Heard on the appeal.

6.

ADMIT.

7.

Call for the record and proceedings from the concerned Court.

8.

Earlier the learned advocate Ms.Jayshri P. Reddy was appointed by this Court to represent the appellant/ accused. However, today the learned advocate Shri P.P. Giri has appeared and has stated that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the appellant in this matter. He, therefore, prays for some time to file the Vakalatnama.

9.

Time is granted.

10.

In view of the above, the appearance of Ms.Reddy is discharged. Her fees shall be quantified as per the rules and shall be paid by the High Court Legal Aid Services Sub-Committee, Bench at Aurangabad.

11.

Put up the matter on 29.09.2025.

*4* (d) Criminal Appeal No.972/2024:- 12.

Heard on the appeal.

13.

ADMIT.

14.

Call for the record and proceedings from the concerned Court.

15.

Put up the matter on 29.09.2025.

kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )