← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10503/2025disposed off

Sachin Anilrao Kottakondawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025-10-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:28686-DB 922-WP-10503-25.odt {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 WRIT PETITION NO. 10503 OF 2025 Sachin Anilrao Kottakondawar

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ......

Mr. P.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. S.D. Ghayal, AGP for Respondent No.1 Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ......

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 09 OCTOBER, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Issue notice to respondents. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent No.1. Learned Advocate Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, waives service of notice for respondent No.2. 2.

The present petition has been filed for direction to respondent No.2 to correct the caste of the petitioner as 'Shimpi' instead of 'Chattri' in his school record.

3.

We do not go much into the facts of the matter along with the application, it appears that caste certificate has also been presented before the respondent No.2. Respondent No. 2 rejected the application solely on the ground that the petitioner is not still taking education in the school, and therefore, the application is not maintainable under Rule 26.4 of the Secondary Schools Code (S.S. Code).

922-WP-10503-25.odt {2} 4.

The learned Advocate relies on the decision in Janabai D/o Himmatrao Thakur v. The State of Maharashtra and Others, a Full Bench decision in Writ Petition No. 8085 of 2017, decided on 17.10.2019, wherein it is held that such an application is maintainable and it would be within the said rules.

5.

We, therefore, allow the petition in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Such order shall be passed within a period of 15 days from today. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE S P Rane