← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10052/2012disposed offdismissed for default

Vinod Subhash Kejkar v. State Selection Commission And ANR

2018-02-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora1 pages

1 9824.2012wp..doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.9824 OF 2012 Sanjay Prakashrao Nimbalkar .. Petitioner

Versus

State Election Commission & Another ..Respondents ...

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10052 OF 2012 (Vinod Subhash Kejkar V/s State Election Commission & Another) ....

Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri P.S. Paranjape, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mrs V.S. Chaudhari, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.2 ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & P. R. BORA, JJ.

Date : February 13, 2018 PER COURT :

1.

With the passage of time, purpose underlying writ petitions has come to an end. Writ petitions have been rendered infructuous and are disposed of, as such.

[ P.R. BORA ] [ SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ] JUDGE JUDGE ggpunde