Payal Rakesh Gopnarayan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

cria2394.20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2394 OF 2020

1) Jai W/o Ajit Pathak,

2) Madhuri W/o Arvind Bhale ...APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others.

...RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.Akshay D. Kulkarni Advocate for Applicants. Mr.S.J. Salgare, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.

Mr.N.R. Shaikh Advocate for Resp. No.2.

Mr.P.K. Nikam Advocate for Resp. No.3.

...

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2398 OF 2020 Payal Rakesh Gopnarayan ...APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others.

...RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.Kachru A. Ingle Advocate for Applicant.

Mr.S.J. Salgare, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.

Mr.N.R. Shaikh Advocate for Resp. No.2.

Mr.P.K. Nikam Advocate for Resp. No.3.

...

cria2394.20 CORAM: V.K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 7th DECEMBER, 2021 ORDER :

1.

We heard learned counsel Shri Kulkarni and learned counsel Shri Ingle for the applicants for some time. Learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seek leave to withdraw both these applications with liberty to the applicants to file applications for discharge in the trial Court. 2.

Leave granted. Both the Applications are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to each of the applicants to file application for discharge before the trial Court in pending case. 3.

We have not considered the merits and on filing such application for discharge, it is for the trial Court to consider the same on its own merits, in accordance with law. [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] [V.K. JADHAV] JUDGE JUDGE asb/DEC21