← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10151/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Vaibhav Vinayak Karad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

{1} wp10151.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10151 OF 2018 Vaibhav Vinayak Karad Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. S.S. Dambe, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Pawar, A.G.P. for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, advocate for respondent no. 3. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 5th SEPTEMBER, 2018 PER COURT:

Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 makes a statement on instructions that since the validity certificate has already been issued to the petitioner prior to the cut off date, his name would be considered for the said reserved category during the second round of admission process for Bachelor of Physiotherapy course. In view of the statement made, the grievance of the petitioner in the instant petition substantially stands redressed. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

MANGESH S. PATIL R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb