Vaijinath Balaji Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

913-WP-10164-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10164 OF 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1835 OF 2021 Ramesh Pralhad Kate ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..

Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 10161 OF 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1840 OF 2021 Vaijinath Balaji Gaikwad ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..

Respondents ...

Mr. V. H. Dighe, Advocate for petitioner-applicant in both CAs Mr. S.N. Kendre, AGP for respondents - State Mr. R. L. Kute, Advocate for respondents no. 4 and 5 in both CAs ...

CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2021 PER COURT :- Learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions, states that in view of further developments taking place during the pendency of present writ petitions, fresh proposals dated 14th December, 2020 are submitted by management for approval to appointment of petitioners, and it would be worthwhile that same be considered by respondent no. 3 - Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Hingoli.

913-WP-10164-19.odt 2.

In view of statement made by learned counsel for petitioners, writ petitions are disposed of being infructuous. 3.

It would be expedient that respondent no. 3 - Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Hingoli considers the proposals for approval to appointment of petitioners and decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three weeks from date of receipt of writ of this order.

4.

Civil applications are disposed of accordingly. ( ABHAY AHUJA ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ) JUDGE JUDGE rrd