Bombay High CourtCA/11697/2016disposed offdismissed for default

H. H. Rupani, Sole Proprietor Of M/S H.H. Rupani Engineers And Contractors, Pune v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran Thr Its Chief Engineer(Konkan Region) , Thane Thr Exe. Engineer, Bee

2017-11-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11697 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11695 OF 2016 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (Stamp) No. 23794 of 2016 in ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 H. H. RUPANI, SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S H.H. RUPANI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, PUNE

VERSUS

MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN THR ITS CHIEF ENGINEER(KONKAN REGION) , THANE THR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Thigale Girish K. (Naik) Mr. R.S.Deshmukh, advocate h/f Mr. D.P. Bakshi Adv. For Review Applicant (Respondent in Civil Application) ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11695 OF 2016 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (Stamp) No. 23794 of 2016 in ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN THR ITS CHIEF ENGINEER(KONKAN REGION) , THANE THR

VERSUS

H. H. RUPANI, SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S H.H. RUPANI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, PUNE ...

Mr. R.S.Deshmukh, advocate h/f Mr. D.P. Bakshi Adv. For applicant Advocate for Respondent : Thigale Girish K. (Naik) ...

WITH REVIEW APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 23794 OF 2016 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN THR ITS CHIEF ENGINEER(KONKAN REGION) , THANE THR

VERSUS

H. H. RUPANI, SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S H.H. RUPANI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, PUNE ...

Mr. R.S.Deshmukh, advocate h/f Mr. D.P. Bakshi Adv. For applicant Advocate for Respondent : Thigale Girish K. (Naik) ...

CORAM : N.W.SAMBRE, J.

DATED : 16th November, 2017 PER COURT : - A motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 7.11.2017, passed by this Court in this application. In the said order in appearance clause in place of words "Mr. Girish K.Thigle (Naik), Advocate for petitioner" words, "Mr. Girish K.Thigle (Naik), Advocate for applicant" are required to be replaced .

So also in the said order on page no.1 paragraph no.1 line no.1 in place of words "Mr. Thigle, learned counsel for applicant" words "Shri Deshmukh, learned counsel for Review

Applicant (Respondent in Civil Application)" and in place of words, "Shri Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondent" words, "Shri Thigale, learned counsel for Review Respondent (Applicant in Civil Application)" are required to be replaced. Necessary correction as above be carried out. After carrying out appropriate correction, the Registry is directed to issue corrected copies to the respective parties. Motion is disposed of.

[N.W.SAMBRE, J.] dbm