← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/16247/2022disposed off

Ex. Engineer Irrigation Dept. Strengthening Div. Omerga Now K.M.C.D. No. 1 Osmanabad v. Vithal Ratu Shinde

2022-12-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

1 920 T0 923 CA 16242-22+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16240 OF 2022 IN FAST/24182/2022 WITH CA/16241/2022 IN FAST/24182/2022 EX ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT.STRENTHENING DIV OMERGA

VERSUS

KALIDAS NARASU SHINDE DIED THR LRS SUMAN AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. R. Survase Advocate for Respondents : Mr. L. C. Patil ...

AND 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16242 OF 2022 IN FAST/24390/2022 WITH CA/16243/2022 IN FAST/24390/2022 EX. ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT. STRENGTHENING DIV. OMERGA NOW K.M.C.D. NO. 1 OSMANABAD

VERSUS

PRATAP GOVIND SHINDE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. R. Survase Advocate for Respondent : Mr. L.C. Patil ...

AND 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16244 OF 2022 IN FAST/24364/2022 WITH CA/16245/2022 IN FAST/24364/2022 EX. ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT. STRENGTHENING DIV. OMERGA NOW K.M.C.D. NO. 1 OSMANABAD

VERSUS

MAHADEO RATU SHINDE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. R. Survase Advocate for Respondent : Mr. L. C. Patil ...

2 920 T0 923 CA 16242-22+ AND 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16247 OF 2022 IN FAST/24346/2022 WITH CA/16246/2022 IN FAST/24346/2022 EX. ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT. STRENGTHENING DIV. OMERGA NOW K.M.C.D. NO. 1 OSMANABAD

VERSUS

VITHAL RATU SHINDE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. R. Survase Advocate for Respondent : Mr. L.C. Patil ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 07/12/2022.

P. C. :

IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16240 OF 2022, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16242 OF 2022, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16244 OF 2022 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16247 OF 2022 :

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to respondents. The learned counsel Mr. L. C. Patil waives notice for the respondents in all these matters. 3.

Heard rival submissions. The appellant acquiring body is seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in all these applications, which appear to be caused due to obtaining sanctions at various stages. There is no strong objection from other side. 4.

In view of the same, the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned.

5.

The appeals be placed for admissions after removal of offce objections, if any. The applications are accordingly disposed of.

3 920 T0 923 CA 16242-22+ IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16241 OF 2022, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16243 OF 2022, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16245 OF 2022 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16246 OF 2022 :

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to respondents. Learned counsel MR. L. C. Patil, waives notice for all the respondents.

3.

There shall be adinterim stay in terms of prayer clause-B in all these applications subject to deposit of entire amounts of compensation under the impugned awards within 12 weeks from the date of this order.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-