Shantaram Laxman Kshirsagar v. The State Election Commission Of Maharashtra Through Its Election Commissioner Mumbai And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

930 WRIT PETITION NO. 9394 OF 2016 SHANTARAM LAXMAN KSHIRSAGAR

VERSUS

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS ELECTION COMMISSIONER MU ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.B. Temak AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Responden t No.1 :Mr. S.T. Shelke Advocate for Respondent No.4 :Mr. R.V. Naiknaware ...

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ.

Dated: October 04, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- It is not the case of the petitioner that his right to franchise has been taken away, however, his name has been shifted from one ward to another. According to the respondent the inclusion of the name of the petitioner in another ward is in consonance with the delimits of the wards which order has become final.

Keeping the option of the petitioner to avail of remedies available in law, at an appropriate stage open, the writ petition stands disposed of.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) vbd