← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13572/2022delay condonatedrejected

Amruta Wd/O Balu Dahiphale And ORS v. Jalindar Maruti Katke And ORS

2023-01-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

1 974 ca 13572-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 974 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13572 OF 2022 IN FAST/24590/2022 AMRUTA WD/O BALU DAHIPHALE AND ORS

VERSUS

JALINDAR MARUTI KATKE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A. K. Gawali Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 : Mr. P. B. Rakhunde Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. M. R. Deshmukh ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 24/01/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants / claimants are seeking condonation of delay of 91 days, which appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. Though the application is strongly opposed, but considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 91 days stands condoned. 3.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any. The application is disposed of accordingly. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-