← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9226/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Balaji @ Govind Vithoba Birajdar (Dhumal) And ORS v. Uma Namdeo Naikwade

2024-08-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:19608 1 925 ca 9226-24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9226 OF 2024 IN SAST/23284/2024 BALAJI @ GOVIND VITHOBA BIRAJDAR (DHUMAL) AND ORS

VERSUS

UMA NAMDEO NAIKWADE ...

Mr. Hanmant Bhagwan Nandagavale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. P.G.Patil h/f Mr. Santosh B. Gastgar, Advocate for Respondent ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 28/08/2024.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The application is filed for condonation of delay of only 12 days in filing the second appeal.

3.

Though the application is opposed, but considering the short period of delay, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause-B and disposed of accordingly.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-