Ramnath Bhagwan Khedkar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} 906WP10174-17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10174 OF 2017 Ramnath Bhagwan Khedkar and Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. P.R. Nangare, Advocate for Petitioners Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. R.V. Naiknaware, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 .........

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9209 OF 2018 Anandkumar Ramchandra Chordiya ...Applicant

Versus

Ramnath Bhagwan Khedkar and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. S.K. Kadam, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. R.V. Naiknaware, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 ...........

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.

DATE: 7th SEPTEMBER, 2018 PER COURT 1.

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners placed on record the written communication whereby petitioners informed to the Counsel that certain steps are taken by the

{2} 906WP10174-17 Municipal Council and in response to the notices, the petitioners deposited the property tax with the Municipal Council and as of now, there is no grievance of the petitioners against the Municipal Council. With these submissions, the petitioners pray for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. In view of the communication received by the learned Counsel, the petitioners are allowed to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

2.

Communication received by the learned Counsel is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. 3.

In view of the withdrawal of the Writ Petition, no orders are required to be passed on the application seeking intervention. Needless to state that the contentions raised in the application are kept open. The Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to approach this Court as and when occasion arises in future.

( MANISH PITALE ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE ) JUDGE JUDGE mta