Yogesh Annarao Lokhande v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

905-RA-205-2018 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 205 OF 2018 IN WP/8570/2018 YOGESH ANNARAO LOKHANDE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. D. M. Wagh Patil and Aniruddha B. Ghule, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the Respondents.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

PER COURT:- 1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he could not remain present when the matter was called out and in his absence writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to avail the remedy of Second Appeal.

2.

The learned counsel submits that in the similar case, this Court had directed the release of vehicle.

3.

We have disposed of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has remedy of Appeal. The petitioner certainly has remedy of Appeal and in Appeal all the necessary reliefs can

905-RA-205-2018 (2) be claimed by the petitioner.

4.

In view of the above, it is not necessary to recall the order, as liberty has been given to the petitioner to prefer an Appeal.

5.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

No costs.

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/September-18 by Devendra Nandkumar Kale Date: 2018.09.28 18:10:45 +0530 Devendra Nandkumar Kale