← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10674/2019delay condonatedrejected

Vithal Natha Patil Antarai v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2022-07-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

(1) 940 CA-10674.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10674 OF 2019 IN FAST/25523/2019 VITHAL NATHA PATIL ANTARAI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Milind Joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

27.07.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant / original claimant and the learned A.G.P. The respondent No. 2 Acquiring Body despite service, remained absent. 2.

Though there appears substantial delay of 1836 days in fling the appeal, but for the reasons mentioned in the application and considering the statutory right of the applicant, the delay stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not be entitled to claim any interest for the delay period.

3.

The Civil Application stands disposed of.

4.

The First Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde