Chaitnya @ Mayur Narayan Kumawat v. Revati @ Chaitnya @ Mayur Narayan Kumawat

ca14109-18 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14109 OF 2018 IN FAMILY COURT APEAL STAMP NO.26198 OF 2018 Chaitnya @ Mayur Narayan KUmawat APPLICANT

VERSUS

Ravati Chaitnya @ Mayur Narayan Kumawat RESPONDENT .......

Ms. P. D. Sakhare h/f Mr. D. P. Sakhare, Advocate for applicant Ms. N. D. Borade, Advocate for the respondent .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.] DATE : 12 th APRIL, 2019 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

2.

Learned advocate for the applicant submits that information about the decision in the matter had not been given to her within prescribed period and as such, there was no knowledge to her of the same which has caused delay. 3.

Though learned advocate for the respondent purports to resist the contentions advanced on behalf of the applicant, yet she is not in a position to overcome the same by any plausible and credible material.

4.

In view of the same, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of.

[R. G. AVACHAT] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca14109-18

ca14109-18 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APEAL STAMP NO.26198 OF 2018 Chaitnya @ Mayur Narayan KUmawat APPLICANT

VERSUS

Ravati Chaitnya @ Mayur Narayan Kumawat RESPONDENT .......

Ms. P. D. Sakhare h/f Mr. D. P. Sakhare, Advocate for applicant Mr. N. D. Borade, Advocate for the respondent .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.] DATE : 12 th APRIL, 2019 ORDER :

Put up the family court appeal for admission on 26th June, 2019.

[R. G. AVACHAT] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca14109-18