Dilip Digambar Tayade v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary Urban Development Department Mantralaya Mumbai

2025:BHC-AUG:9742-DB 932 CP NO.614.2023 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2023 IN WP/11563/2021 DILIP DIGAMBAR TAYADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA MUMBAI ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Y. H. Jadhav AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. N. S. Tekale Advocate for Respondents No. 2 and 3 : Mr. P. V. Gole h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. AND MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.

Dated : April 2, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

The order of which the contempt is alleged is complied with. Though part amount was paid within the deadline given by this Court and part amount is paid after the deadline and benefits of 7th Pay Commission are yet to be released in favour of the petitioner.

Respondents, in their affidavit-in-reply, have explained that the delay in payment of gratuity, commutation of pension and revised pension as per 7th Pay Commission was due to procedural aspect and for necessary sanctions and conclusion of departmental inquiry and the queries raised by the Government Auditor in the

932 CP NO.614.2023 -2Special Audit. The delay is not intentional or deliberate. 2.

We accept the said explanation and in view of the compliance of the order passed by this Court, the contempt petition is, disposed of.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Omkar Joshi