Dattatraya Ishwarlal Deshmukh And Another v. Ramhari Babasaheb Ubhedal And Another

CA 11758/14 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11758/2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.25923/2014 Dattatraya Ishwarlal Deshmukh and another.

...Applicants..

Versus

Ramhari Babasaheb Ubhedal & another.

...Respondents...

.....

Shri A.C. Darandale, Advocate for applicants. Shri P.A. Bharat, Advocate for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 served.

.....

CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE: 10.02.2015 ORDER :

1] Advocate Shri P.A. Bharat has filed Vakalatnama in the Court on behalf of respondent no.1. The same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit X. None appears for the respondent no.2 though duly served.

2] Heard both the sides.

3] Delay of 81 days is sought to be condoned by the applicants / appellants on the ground that due to the

CA 11758/14 - 2 - communication gap between them and the Advocates as also difficulty in raising the funds, the delay has occurred. 4] Sufficient reasons are made out to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. Civil application is allowed and disposed of without any order as to costs. (M.T. JOSHI, J.) ndk/c1021535.doc