← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10105/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Anita Achyutrao Barkule v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-09-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10105 OF 2018 ANITA ACHYUTRAO BARKULE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Bagal Vishal A.

AGP for Respondents: Mr.S.B.Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr.S.S.Tope ...

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.

DATE : 10/09/2018 PER COURT :- On consideration of documentary evidence and Annexures to the petition referring age of the petitioner, the same shall not form the basis of recording change in entries in the school record. The petitioner has left the school long back and is not prosecuting studies as on today.

2] Apart from this, it is informed that the petitioner is victim of rape and the age of prosecutrix may be a question of some significance in criminal case, as such belated request for recording change in the school record appears to have been made. In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction, no interference is called for.

-23] Petition is devoid of substance. Hence stands rejected. (MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (R.M.BORDE,J.) umg/