Sharad Popal Kalaskar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

12WP10348.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10348 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10366 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10367 OF 2018 ANIL GANPAT KALASKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar. AGP for State : Mr. N.T. Bhagat.

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated : February 12, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

These petitions, based on identical set of facts, were considered. However, the petitioners have a statutory remedy under Section 257 of the MLR Code by approaching the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Division Office at Nashik. 2.

Learned advocate for the petitioners sought a pass over and subsequently makes a statement on instructions when these matters are called out that, these petitioners would approach the concerned statutory authority and the time spent by petitioners in this Court from 30.08.2018 till the passing of this order be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay.

12WP10348.18 3.

In view of the above, these petitions are disposed off with liberty to approach the appropriate statutory authority. The time spent by these petitioners in this Court from 30.08.2018 till the passing of this order shall be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) S.P.C.