Arpita Ramesh Jamadar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 6008.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 105 WRIT PETITION NO.6008 OF 2020 ARPITA RAMESH JAMADAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Jadhavar Pratap V. AGP for Respondents No. 1&2: Mr. S. B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent No. 3: Mr. M. D. Narwadkar ...

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE:

10th JANUARY, 2022 PER COURT:

1.

Mr. Jadhavar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Caste claim of the Petitioner as belonging to Koli Mahadev, Scheduled Tribe is invalidated.

2.

Amongst other submissions, one of the submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that the old documents of the year1347 and 1351 Fasli are not verified by the vigilance and the Committee on it's own recorded it's finding.

3.

The learned A.G.P. submits that the proceedings of the validity holders relied by the Petitioner are re-opened.

2 wp 6008.2020 4.

Considering the fact that the matter pertains to social status of the Petitioner, we are inclined to grant one more opportunity to the Petitioner.

5.

The Committee may get the old documents i.e.

Pahani Patrak of the year-1347 and 1351 Fasli verified through vigilance and thereafter decide the proceeding afresh.

6.

The Petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 15.02.2022.

7.

The Committee shall, thereafter, endeavour to decide the proceeding to the extent of the Petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (04) months.

8.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

[S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe