Raghu Narsing Survase v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

959-CA-489-20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 489 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 25678 OF 2019 Balaji Kishan Survase ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS AND CA/490/2020 IN FAST/25691/2019 AND CA/492/2020 IN FAST/25700/2019 AND CA/494/2020 IN FAST/25703/2019 AND CA/493/2020 IN FAST/25697/2019 AND CA/491/2020 IN FAST/25694/2019 ....

Mr. N.G. Kale, Advocate for applicants Mr. A.M. Phule, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. S.C. Arora, Advocate for respondent no.3 ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 01st OCTOBER, 2021 PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for Respondent No.3 - acquiring body submits that the delay is huge one. Same has not been properly explained in the applications. He, therefore, seeks rejection of the applications. 1 / 2

959-CA-489-20.odt 3.

Learned counsel for the applicants proposes for enhancement of compensation since their agricultural lands have compulsorily acquired. 4.

In view of same, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), provided the applicants shall not be entitled for the interest for the delayed period.

( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2