Aruna Shriram Maid And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:22286-DB 1 995.WP.10200.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10200 OF 2025 ARUNA SHRIRAM MAID AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Anil Jaiswal Govt. Pleader for Respondents/State : Mr. A.B. Girase Advocate for Respondent - Corporation : Mr. S.S. Tope ...

CORAM

: MANISH PITALE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 14.08.2025 PER COURT:

1.

This petition is filed by the petitioners on an apprehension that the respondent - Municipal Corporation will be proceeding against them in the light of certain proclamation made, in the context of road widening action undertaken by respondent - Municipal Corporation.

2.

It is specifically stated, on instructions, by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Municipal Corporation that insofar as the petitioners in this petition are concerned, in the event the properties / structures belonging to the petitioners are required for executing the project of road widening, the respondent - Municipal Corporation shall proceed strictly in accordance with law and that the mandate of law, including the position clarified by this Court and the Supreme Court in various judgments, shall be followed in letter and spirit.

2 995.WP.10200.25.odt 3.

We are satisfied that the aforesaid statement sufficiently addresses the apprehensions expressed on behalf of the petitioners and, therefore by recording the said statement, we dispose of the present petition. 4.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) habeeb/