Gaddubai Ramvallabh Varma Thro. General Power Of Attorney Holder, Brijmohan Ramvallabh Varma v. Abdul Hamid Abdul Sattar And Another

SA-218-2021 WITH CA-12665-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.218 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12665 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 218 OF 2021 Smt. Gaddubai W/o. Ramvallabh Varma ... Appellant (Orig. Defendant)

Versus

Abdul Hamid S/o Abdul Sattar and Anr.

... Respondents (Orig. Plaintiffs) . . .

Mr. B. R. Waramaa, Advocate for Appellant.

Mr. A. B. Kharosekar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 20 APRIL 2022 PER COURT :

1.

The parties were before the Mediator.

2.

The Mediator has submitted a positive report in terms of settlement arrived at before the Mediator. Accompanying the report is marked '

X' for the purpose of identification.

3.

The second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. 4.

Decree be drawn accordingly.

1/2

SA-218-2021 WITH CA-12665-2019.odt 5.

Learned advocate Mr. Kharosekar for respondent No.2 submits that there was delay in filing the second appeal. It was condoned subject to appellants depositing a cost of Rs.7,000/- and the amount is lying in the court and it may be directed to be paid to the respondents. 6.

Learned advocate Mr. Waramaa for the appellant does not have any objection for the amount of cost being paid to the respondents. 7.

Refund the Court fees as per rules.

8.

Civil application is disposed of.

( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) Tandale/- 2/2