Sanjay Vithalrao Pawar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

ca10972-21 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10972 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 14309 OF 2019 Sanjay Vithalrao Pawar and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mrs. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicants Mr. P. N. Kutti, AGP for respondent - State Mr. M.M.Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for respondents No.8-A to 8E .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 6 th JULY, 2022 ORDER :

1.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B".

2.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today.

3.

Mr. M. M. Patil - Beedkar appears for the added respondents.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca10972-21

ca10972-21 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10964 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 15296 OF 2019 Chandrashekhar Tukaram Pawar and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Vithalrao Sudamrao Pawar and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. M. M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for applicants Mr. P. N. Kutti, AGP for respondent - State Mrs. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 to 4 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 6 th JULY, 2022 ORDER :

1.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "C". 2.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca10972-21