Annarao Dattatraya Dawale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

961-CA-528-20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 528 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 25736 OF 2019 Venkat Dulbha Dawale ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 527 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 25786 OF 2019 ....

Mr. N.G. Kale, Advocate for applicants Mr. P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. V.C. Solshe, Advocate for respondent no.3 ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 01st OCTOBER, 2021 PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for Respondent No.3 - acquiring body submits that the delay is huge one. Same has not been properly explained in the applications. He, therefore, seeks rejection of the applications. 3.

The poor agriculturists are said to have proposed to file appeal against the amount of compensation inadequately enhanced by the Reference 1 / 2

961-CA-528-20.odt Court for their land compulsorily acquired. For the reasons given for delay condonation, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), provided the applicants shall not be entitled for the interest for the delayed period of 2384 days.

( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2