The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Z.P. Osmanabad Thr Its Authorized Officer v. Rajkumar Rangnath Dhavalshankh And ORS
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2202 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25816 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2219 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25821 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2217 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25826 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2204 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25830 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2206 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25833 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2209 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25837 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2211 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25840 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2215 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25843 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2221 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25848 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2213 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25852 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25855 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2223 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25859 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2225 OF 2022 IN
{2} FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25862 OF 2019 Mr. R. D. Raut, advocate for the applicant-acquiring body. Mr. A. B. Kale, advocate for Respondents-claimants CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 19th July, 2023.
PC :
Heard rival submissions.
The applicant-acquiring body is seeking condonation of delay of 1877 days, in all these applications, which appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages. Though the application is opposed by the respective respondents-claimants, but considering the statutory right of the applicant, delay of 1877 days, in all these applications, stands condoned.
Appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.
Civil Applications are disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb
{3}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2203 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25816 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2220 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25821 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2218 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25826 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2205 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25830 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2207 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25833 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2210 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25837 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2212 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25840 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2216 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25843 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2222 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25848 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2214 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25852 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2201 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25855 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2224 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25859 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2226 OF 2022 IN
{4} FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25862 OF 2019 Mr. R. D. Raut, advocate for the applicant-acquiring body. Mr. A. B. Kale, advocate for Respondents-claimants CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 19th July, 2023.
PC :
Though it was made clear by this Court under order dated 10.11.2022 that the respective respondentsclaimants are free to pursue the remedy of execution, but the learned Counsel for the appellant-acquiring body is ready to deposit entire amount of compensation along with interest, in all these matters.
As such, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause {B} subject to deposit of entire amounts of compensation along with interest, in all these matters, within the period of twelve weeks.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb