← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3672/2014dismissedrule discharged

The Parbhani District Central Co-Op Bank Ltd. v. Ramesh Raghunathrao Kadam

2015-01-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav3 pages

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3560 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

VIJAY PRABHAKAR INGLE WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3573 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

RAMPRASAD PANDHARINATH CHOKHAT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3672 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

RAMESH RAGHUNATHRAO KADAM WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3673 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

RAMDAS GOPAL HAZARE WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3671 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

UTTAM SITARAM WAGHMARE WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4558 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

SUNIL MADHUKARRAO JAGDALE WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4559 OF 2014 THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.

VERSUS

-2RAMPRASAD VITTHALRAO BOBDE ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.S. Shaikh h/f Mr. Deshmukh Sachin S. Advocate for respondent : Mr. P.S. Koshti (in writ petition No. 3573 of 2014, 4558 of 2014 and 4559 of 2014.

.....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 16th JANUARY, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

Heard.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondents in respective writ petitions, submits that the identical controversy, based on the identical set of facts, involving the same petitioner, has already been dealt with by this Court vide judgment dated 8.10.2014 delivered in writ petition No. 3382 of 2014.

3.

In the light of above, the impugned judgments in these writ petitions delivered by the Industrial Court cannot be said to be perverse or an erroneous. Thus, no interference in the impugned judgments is called for. The writ petitions, being devoid of merit therefore, are dismissed. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/

-3-