← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/15892/2022delay condonatedrejected

Meenadevi Shankarlal Gindodiya v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Jalna And ORS

2023-02-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

1 93 ca 15892-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 93 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15892 OF 2022 IN FAST/24930/2022 MEENADEVI SHANKARLAL GINDODIYA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, JALNA ANDORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ishwar K. Wagh h/f Mr. More Kumar Gaurav M.

AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Khaire h/f Mr. S. S. Dande ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 06/02/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1334 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor fnancial condition. 3.

The learned counsel for acquiring body and the learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 1334 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. The application is accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-