Namdeo Tukaram Dhokare And ORS v. Shaikh Tausim Shaikh Nabi And ORS

10182.19CA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10182 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1289 OF 2018 NAMDEO TUKARAM DHOKARE & OTHERS

VERSUS

SHAIKH TAUSIM SHAIKH NABI & OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.S.N.Pagare ...

CORAM : S.G.DIGE, J.

DATE : 27.06.2022 P.C. :

1] Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that respondent nos. 1 and 2 are not traceable. He has tried to contact with the learned Advocate, who was representing them before the trial court, he came to know that the learned Advocate is also not aware about the address of respondent nos.1 and 2, hence, requested to serve them through paper publication.

2] Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants as well as there is a bailiff report on record, which shows that respondent nos.1 and 2 are not

10182.19CA found on given address. Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B.

3] Accordingly, Civil Application is disposed of. 4] List the First Appeal on 10th August, 2022.

[S.G.DIGE] JUDGE DDC