Tupkar Ravikumar Dnyanoba v. The State Election Commission Through Its Commissioner Mumbai And Others

wp10555.17 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10555 OF 2017 (Tupkar Ravikumar Dnyanoba Vs The State Election Commission through its Commissioner Mumbai and others) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM :

R.M. BORDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATED :

29.08.2017 Mr.Ramchandra S. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for respondent/State Mr.Shivaji T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.1 .

The prescription of reservation declared on 27.03.2015 is a matter of challenge in the instant petition presented after more than two years. The delay and latches in approaching the Court have not been properly explained by the petitioner.

In view of above no interference is caused in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

wp10555.17 2.

The petition being devoid of substance stands disposed of.

[S.M. GAVHANE,J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.] VishalK/wp10555.17