Bombay High CourtWP/9248/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Madhuri Pradeep Gadekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2016-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane1 pages

{1} wp924816.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9248 OF 2016 Sau.Madhuri w/o Pradeep Gadekar Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr.V.D.Salunke, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents.

Mr.S.S.Thombre, advocate for applicants in C.A. for intervention. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 31st August, 2016 PER COURT:

The earlier notice impugned in this petition has been superseded by fresh notice. Copies of relevant notices are placed on record and marked "X" for identification.

In view of this development, challenge raised in the petition does not survive. If the petitioner is desirous of challenging fresh notice, it would be open for the petitioner to take steps in accordance with provisions of law.

With the liberty as aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of. Civil Application for intervention does not survive and stands disposed of.

K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp924816