Harish Panditrao Bhailume v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

901- Cri. Appln. No. 3161-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3161 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) No. 8696/2022 Harish Panditrao Bhailume

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Another .....

Advocate for the applicant : Mr. R. B. Temak A.P.P for respondent/State : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale ......

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 03.02.2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the respective counsels.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that 29 days delay caused in filing the Criminal Revision Application. The delay is not deliberate. The reason is beyond the control of the applicant. Hence, the delay may be condoned. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 strongly opposed the application. He would submit that the reasons mentioned in the application are not genuine.

4.

Perused the application. Reason for delay appears plausible. No prejudice would cause to other side if the delay is

901- Cri. Appln. No. 3161-2022.odt condoned. Hence, the following order.

ORDER

(i) The delay caused in filing the criminal revision application is condoned.

(ii) The registry is directed to register the revision application. 5.

Place the matter on 24.2.2023.

(S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE ysk